Suspicion, 1941, RKO Radio Pictures. Starring Cary Grant, Joan Fontaine. Directed by Alfred Hitchcock. B&W, 99 minutes.
Lina McLaidlaw (Joan Fontaine), crushed after hearing her parents describe her as “spinsterish,” allows herself to fall for the charms of roguish playboy Johnnie Aysgarth (Cary Grant). In short order, the two are married and off on a lavish honeymoon.
Lina is madly in love, but her feelings are soon tempered by the discovery Johnnie has no money and no intention of keeping a job. Little by little she learns of his many deceptions, and her concerns turn to fear for her life. Yet she still can be drawn in by his charming side, and remains in love with her dishonorable husband.
When a close friend dies mysteriously and Johnnie lies about his whereabouts at the time of his death, Lina is convinced Johnnie is guilty of murder.

Cary Grant, Joan Fontaine
Suspicion was nominated for three Academy Awards: Best Picture, Best Original Score, and Best Actress for Fontaine, which she won, making that the only Oscar for a performance in a Hitchcock film. Her portrayal of the timid woman who gradually recognizes her husband’s true nature was subtle and nuanced, reminiscent of her performance in Rebecca a year earlier.
Grant’s performance is of particular note as well. He plays his character as charming and likable, and no actor of that time possessed more of those qualities than Cary Grant. He is tremendously appealing, and it’s easy to see why his wife is so enamored of him and reluctant to face the possibility he has an evil side, capable of murder. It’s hard to imagine any other actor of the time playing the role in this manner so well, and it contributes significantly to the veracity of the plot.
Yet there is an underlying dark side to Johnnie that shows itself throughout the story, making his charm somewhat eerie.

Cary Grant
Hitchcock never missed a beat in using detail to enhance the story. In a pivotal scene, the glass of milk Grant is seen taking to his wife actually had a light placed inside of it, thus ensuring it became the focal point desired by Hitchcock. This subtle trick increases the tension of the scene, as does, of course, the score, which was also used to great effect in the film.
Spoiler Alert
In later interviews, Hitchcock revealed that he would have liked to make Grant the killer, carrying out his evil deed by bringing Fontaine a poisoned glass of milk in the last scene. Unbeknownst to him, she is writing a letter to her mother in which she expresses her fear and conviction that her husband is the killer. She asks him to mail the letter for her, drinks the milk, and Grant is seen cheerfully dropping the letter in a corner mailbox, thus sealing his own fate.
However, Cary Grant’s star status made it virtually impossible for Hitchcock to cast him as a killer, a problem he’d encountered before when making a film in England with a matinee-idol actor he would have like to cast as Jack the Ripper. An unfortunate situation, because the preferred ending certainly would have been the better one.
Studio executives were so conscious of Grant’s image that at one point one of RKO’s producers cut out any scene or portion thereof that insinuated Grant could be a killer. Hitchcock furiously objected, and his habit of filming scenes exactly as he intended to use them, thus leaving little or no extra footage to work with, helped him win that battle and place all the removed scenes back where they belonged.
Suspicion is a good film, perhaps not Hitchcock’s finest, but notable for its tight storytelling and steady pace of psychological tension, with the buildup of anticipation of which he was master. The credibility, or lack thereof, of the ending makes one wish Hitchcock could have filmed it the way he desired, but the star system of the day and Hollywood’s at times annoying tendency to guarantee a happy ending precluded that possibility.

Cary Grant, Joan Fontaine
You’re so right on the ending. As you noted, the film is a good one. I’ve watched this one several times and a I remember way back when….when I watched it for the first time, I thought to myself…good, but the ending just doesn’t work. Hitchcock, as usual, knew better. Thank you for another wonderful review!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you! Yes, I wish they had been able to do it “right.” Apparently even audiences at the time were disappointed, so the Cary Grant aura could have been shaken. Today’s actors would clamor to play the bad guy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] this became a breakout role for her. It led to other significant parts, including the lead in Suspicion the following year, for which she won the […]
LikeLike
I actually liked the studio-imposed ending. Because Grant is not the killer, the whole thing comes across as a cruel joke, very much in tune with Hitch’s wicked sense of humor. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay, I hadn’t thought of it that way. I will say Hitchcock was brilliant at playing within the bounds, and Grant did a fantastic job of being a charming cad. Maybe it should be enough that he was playing that much against type! And of course the reality is, no one wants to find out someone is a killer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] was Grant’s second Hitchcock film (the first being Suspicion) and it was a more subdued role from his usual screwball comedy performances. He performed the […]
LikeLike